
THINKHOLD
Data driven scale models of quantified science.
Hold the results.
Physics made thinkable.
Attometers to Femtometers.
Ω(r)ϕ - The Anchor Model :


Toy models of the proposed Anchor Model using soliton dynamics to replace the Cluster Model.
Guided by observed nuclear charge radii and molecular geometry to inform the functionally useful nuclear anatomy above.




Picometers, Angstroms, and Nano meters, oh my.
Atoms & Molecules :
The Anchor model delivers a clear set of geometric constraints allowing molecular models to assemble with picometer level fidelity.
Accurate molecular geometry is emergent.
Falsifiable inductive proof serving as useful exploratory models in the meantime.
A zettameter is hard to wrap ones head around, as is the size of our galaxy, the Milky Way.
They happen to be the nearly the same, so I wrapped my head around both by holding them in the palm of my hand, to scale.
Zettameters and beyond.
Galaxies :

: Atoms & Molecules :
Accurate Tools for Chemistry Education
Developing both the elements and infrastructure for teaching and learning the mechanics of chemistry.

















Planets, Galaxies, and Beyond
Naturally the model needs to work at the other end of the spectrum, and for everything in between.
The Scale of a Thousand Steps takes us everywhere, bringing all things at all scales into the palm of our hands.
Accurately.











This model series is new, but on the way.
There will be more categories, scales, and a dedicated website for all final models.
No idea when, the domain is but days old. I'm amidst building this one, and still have many models to produce, refine, and fit for distribution.
The general goal is 3D Printed On-Demand educational kits and support material, mostly focused on accurate scale replicas in a wide range of both scales and subjects.
Thinkable. Teachable. Comprehensive. Accurate. Obtainable. Efficient.
The current is flowing. You can sign up to this here email list thingie if you'd like to be notified when it launches.
The artwork I produce is separate, more a part of my scientific method anyhow. This separate site will be more educational and directly science geared, less playful/abstracted than here. Focused.
Here is where I explore, there is where I will deliver the refined results for others to start exploring with on their own adventures in scientific comprehension. Sign up to know when it goes live.

The atomic models are built directly from empirical data, existing radii and bond lengths.
The Anchor model then puts in place the connection points, the missing framework I desperately needed and was honestly expecting, but never effectively found via existing models.
One day I recognized an angular anomaly from a handful of mechanical scenarios encountered while building robot anatomy over the years, desperate for results I tried it on a whim.
Whispering "No, no way, nu uh, no way it's this simple. No." the entire time.
I explored chemistry, accurately, for a full year after that, before going further.
The molecular assemblies are emergent results and are compared to empirical measurements for confirmation. Accurate every time, and now chemistry is no longer mysterious to me.
How? Welcome to my world, and what the rest of this page is about.
Because that's what I've been trying to figure out over the past year, how was any of this possible in the first place. What follows is me exploring exactly that.
Trying anyway, for I stumbled into far more than I could've expected ahead of time.
Because aside from neutron formation I can't figure out what else, if anything, need occur.
Which would make Ω(r)ϕ the First Principle of All.
! - DISCLAIMER - !

* Nullius in Verba *
It is theory time hence forth, and this is my guiding motto.
Twas also the motto of the Royal Society and those who forged the vast majority of formula and equations that still shape our modern world. Arguably the most formative centuries of practical physics, delivering foundational structure we use to this day.
The part we missed is simple, and always has been. This is a test of recognition, nothing was invented. Models are built from observation and empirical data alone, no calculations or fudge factors required, nor are they possible due to the solid rigid models produced.


"God's Wabi"
The asymmetry that binds reality into physical form.
One of my favorite concepts from Japanese culture, defined as "the mild imperfection in an otherwise perfect creation" and thus exceeds perfection by adding uniqueness.
It's fun to find this reflected so poetically at the heart of physicalized reality, both causing it and keeping it together.
I'm agnostic btw, just running with the theme in case it means more than we yet realize, which I find likely either way.


The Hadron Effect
The moment I realized I stumbled into a ToE... ouch!
Because what else is there?
Serious question.
Everything we know exists as it does as a result of this process. The forging of the Spark itself. First as a neutron, refines(decay) to proton, unless those fuse into larger forms before decay, forming all other isotopes.
And this simple geometry remains at play from nuclei to the BAO.
So again, what else is there?



The name orthogon was just sitting there, unused, available, as if simply waiting for it's day to come.
Soliton dynamics in a field based aether explain monopole anatomy due to the harsh edges forged by orthogonal cross-flow. This is how the knot is tied when it hits the limit of physical packet size ~ .84 fm.
The orthogon is the result, effectively governing molecular geometry. A ball in a box, the Merkabah, Metatron's Cube and other pieces of Sacred Geometry from around the world have shown us all the while.
By far the smallest thickness I have ever encountered, tapering from as close to nothing as is possible up to no thicker that ~7.5 or so attometers afaict, so far. But it's all about what gets packed into that thermally isolated volume, the monopolar dynamo of gravity itself.
Clearly visualized and understood, finally.




















The Orthogon
A new geometry for internal nuclear anatomy

tricyligon /ˌtraɪˈsɪlɪɡɒn/ noun (plural: tricyligons)
1. A curved geometric solid formed by the intersection of three mutually perpendicular cylinders of equal radius, such that the slices along each of its three orthogonal axes are perfect circles.
2. (nuclear geometry) The femtometer-scale realization of the above solid in the structure of atomic nuclei, arising from charge-radius data and soliton-packet curvature.
Etymology: Modern English coinage (2026): tri- (“three”) + cyl- (from “cylinder”) + -igon (after orthogon).
The underlying geometry is the classical Steinmetz tricylinder. It's bicylinder precursor was known to Archimedes (~250 BC) and described in ancient China by Liu Hui (3rd century CE) as the “móu hé fāng gài” (two square umbrellas).
Example “The tricyligon’s three perfectly round axial planes give it exceptional orthogonal stability.”
Utilized as a model to show the direct influence of the planar monopoles that form the orthogon. When that core shape is full, and 8 of 8 electrons fill the outer shell, that is the nucleus of a noble gas. All 8 open? That's a proton and palladium for some reason. Everything else is a state in between, with chemistry the act of filling those voids, effectively visualized by all 8 tips of the tricyligon.
The open vortex produces a rounder shape to each octet, while the inner cone of 19.5 degrees shows the full range of angular geometry found in measured chemical bonds. These are the open vortex that snag the shared electrons that form atomic bonds, matching and explaining observed molecular geometry.




















The Tricyligon
A new geometry for nuclear surface anatomy

Ω(r)ϕ
Twas simple all along.
The spark found me, and now it hath found you.
Onward.


Ω(r)ϕ represents neutron formation as an orthogon. A cartesian knot of monopolar solitons enforced via orthogonal cross-flow.
The Anchor model just so happens to result in accurate molecular geometry as well as reveal the routing of electron flow paths that directly illustrate atom by atom level molecular behaviors.
That is not a sentence I dreamed I'd ever write, and I've done a ton of dreaming.
This is all truly a wildcard, a side-quest becoming the main quest, riding a wave of a discovery born out of a knowledge quest driven by life altering necessity.
Perhaps my lack of formal background kept me unbiased enough to actually try a geometry that seemed way too obvious. Because it is exactly that, effectively hiding in plain sight for millennia.
That and the fact that all the work I have been doing was training me for this in ways I never foresaw, from advanced NURBS modeling since 1998, a critical tool for formalizing quantified data, to useful experience with mechanical anomalies encountered during adventures in robot anatomy, some of which led to key insights one would have trouble recognizing without those experiences.
That's what it takes evidentally, sneaky lil sideways eureka moment hiding within a desperate whim provoked at the bleeding edge of learning about the chemistry behind a life altering health disorder.
I've predicted many things, but never saw anything like this coming. Conciously anyhow, it seems something within me has known the entire time, 30 year old sketches only now making sense.
Just tryna figure out how the orthogon's results consistently produce accurate molecular models in the first place. The most profound aspect of all this is that it worked immediately and has not failed.
It just works, this is me trying to figure out how, why, seriously what have I stumbled into.
This is not how these things usually go, especially in fundamental physics.
Can't even assemble molecules with inaccurate geometry, it won't let you, at most you'll simply get another polymorph assembled from the same atoms. Which is as useful as it sounds.
The Anchor model has been especially useful for the complex biomolecules I've built that typically melt supercomputers using formal models like VSEPR. And even then those often require fudging along the way, and will never come close to the significance of a directly observed empirical measurement.
Which is what I use to check the model results, directly obtained measured states, not educated guesses. Others can do their own math Olympics if that's what they need for further proof and explanation. And are welcome to do just that. I didn't need much to get to this point, I wrangle all that with pure geometry just fine. And it already delivers far more than the results I came for.
A truly simple geometry that clarifies some of the most complex and hard to perceive phenom in physics into a simple straight-forward constraint system that can be fundamentally understood at an elementary level.






Mo' picto mo' picto
Ipsum doio tomorrio, maybeline perhapsinae
